elf.knits

wilwheaton:

Last week, the country was riveted by the story of young Diane Tran, a high school junior age 17, who was tossed in jail for a night because she was missing too much school.

The reason her case attracted so much attention? Tran missed those days of school—or arrived late—due to exhaustion. She worked two jobs to help support her siblings. Her parents had split and moved out of town. She became, in essence, a poster-girl for both the recession and for the criminalization of youth. Even those local newscasters expected to be dispassionate were moved to say their “hearts went out” to this girl.

One of Tran’s employers is a wedding planning business, which she assists and whose owners house her with her parents out of town. The other is a full-time job at a dry cleaning store. Her third job, then, is going to school, where she is enrolled in several AP and honors classes, but missed 18 days. After a previous warning, a judge decided that a night in jail would teach her a lesson. He didn’t see why people were kicking up such a fuss. ”A little stay in the jail for one night is not a death sentence,” the judge told the same local news channel.

But then thousands of people around the world read the headline variations on “honors student goes to jail” and began expressing their support—with their voices and their wallets, signing a petition and contributing to a fund for Tran.

At last, the judge in the case agreed todismiss the contempt charges he had leveled at Tran. News sources reported that with paperwork, she can have her record expunged.

But none of these reprieves happened until Tran had already spent the night in jail.

From Corporations Are People to Stand Your Ground to I’ve Got Mine, So I Don’t Know Why You’re Complaining, Kid, There’s a fundamental lack of compassion in American culture. I don’t know if it’s always been that way, or if it’s the way I see things, or if it’s something that I’m just becoming aware of right now, but I believe it’s profoundly immoral.

And the thing is, it’s a load-bearing pillar in the Conservative mindset, right? Conservatives who self-identify as religious, but completely disregard the teachings of Christ, who — according to the Bible they’re always quoting (as if it begins and ends with Leviticus) — wanted everyone to treat others with love and compassion.

I can’t believe that, in 2012, this country is so unenlightened that there is anyone who thinks it’s okay to put a child in jail for any non-violent offense, even for one night.

If you’re still reading, go read the entire article; it’s important.

I hope this was real. If it was, it’s really too bad it was taken down. I will never understand our society’s fascination with this awful family. Being “famous for being famous” is not a good thing. Why do people worship these talent-less faux-celebrities? It’s really appalling.

(Source: wilwheaton)

wilwheaton:

Moreover, for anyone who defends the Obama administration here and insists that the U.S. Government simply must have access to all forms of human communication: does that also apply to in-person communication? Should home and apartment builders be required to install monitors in every room they build to ensure that the Government can surveil all human communications in order to prevent threats to national security and public safety? I believe someone once wrote a book about where this mindset inevitably leads. The very idea that no human communication should ever be allowed to take place beyond the reach of the Government is definitive authoritarianism, which is why Saudi Arabia and the UAE — and their American patron-ally — have so vigorously embraced it.

Greenwald points out that the FBI does not need this, because they can go to a judge, get a warrant, and use traditional surveillance when it’s necessary. “But what about encryption?!” Well: 

the problem cited by the FBI to justify this new power is a total pretext: “investigators encountered encrypted communications only one time during 2009′s wiretaps” and, even then, “the state investigators told the court that the encryption did not prevent them from getting the plain text of the messages.” As usual, fear-mongering over national security and other threats is the instrument to justify massive new surveillance powers that will extend far beyond their claimed function.

I’m profoundly disappointed in the Obama administration’s record on civil rights and privacy. I expected better from a president who is a Constitutional law scholar.

tl;dr: The very idea that no human communication should ever be allowed to take place beyond the reach of the Government is definitive authoritarianism